Continuous ICT resilience testing for DORA compliance

They track that you scheduled a vulnerability assessment, logged a finding, and opened a ticket. They don't prove the vulnerability was real, that the fix actually worked, or that the exposure no longer exists. That gap is exactly what DORA supervisors are now probing.

DORA's continuous assessment requirement makes it structurally insufficient - a quarterly snapshot doesn't tell a supervisor what your exposure looks like today.

Noisy automated scanners create triage work without generating the evidence supervisors need. The more false positives a tool creates, the longer it takes for validated findings to reach an auditor.

This happens in triage, verification, reformatting, and it does so without answering the questions a supervisor actually asks: was the vulnerability real, was it fixed, and is the fix still holding?

Scheduled scanning ties every finding to a defined date, scope, and asset. The timestamp exists before anyone asks for it. Set assessments to run on a cadence that matches your DORA review cycle, and the scan record is automatically included in the evidence package.

For on-premises or private-network environments, the VPN Agent runs inside the deployment without requiring a permanent on-premises appliance. Banks and financial entities with strict network boundary requirements can run the same workflow internally.

Sniper Auto-Exploiter validates findings and backs them up with HTTP request/response, PoC, or payload evidence. Meanwhile, the ML Classifier reduces false positives by 50%, bringing web scanner accuracy  into cleaner, faster results.

What reaches the auditor is not a list of flags. It's a list of verified vulnerabilities with the evidence attached.

After remediation, a targeted retest runs against the specific finding. The before/after comparison exports alongside the original findings.

The auditor sees what existed, what changed, and when. They don't get a ticket reference that requires chasing or a verbal assurance that the fix held.

Scheduled rescans run the same assessment on the next cycle. If a fix regresses, it surfaces as a new finding with its own timestamp, rather than a gap that only appears at the next audit. The evidence chain remains up to date without manual intervention.

Vulnerability monitoring covers the intervals between scheduled scans, alerting on new exposures as they appear rather than at the next cycle. For DORA's continuous-assessment expectation, this is the difference between evidence that's current and evidence that's merely periodic.

Audit-ready exports in PDF, DOCX, or JSON reduce manual formatting work. Custom report templates let you format evidence the way your compliance framework and supervisors expect.

JSON integrates directly with GRC tools and ticketing systems - so you don’t need to send findings to your workflows manually.